SCHOLARLY ETHICAL PAPER Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

SCHOLARLY ETHICAL - Research subject ExampleThese are some of the ethical questions that may confront a nurse and even different health professionals. The ethical goal of a health professionals practice is to deliver a caring response given an ethical issue or question (Purtilo and Doherty, 2011, p. 25). 2.0. Relevance of the Ethical guinea pig on the Withdrawal of Life Support System The issue on whether it is ethical for nurses to assist diligents or their relatives in the keep apartal of livelihood stand out systems for perseverings is highly relevant because the issue is frequently encountered in the linguistic context of terminally ill cancer patients, stroke, heart attacks, and other illnesses where patients can become comatose. In this case, the case for withdrawing the life system can be debated especially if there are no signs that the patient will withhold from the situation soon. The ethical issue is too relevant in situations where the patient is terminally il l as determined by a adequate medical examination professional, believed to be without possibility of retrieval from the standpoint of medical science, and in extreme and serious pain at the same time. Finally, the ethical issue may also be relevant in situations where nought is footing the bill for the life support system and, yet, the patient does not show signs of recovering from a condition or illness believed to be terminal as determined by a competent medical professional. 3.0. My Argument My argument is for an affirmative response to withdraw the life support system where any of the following applies. Firstly, in situations where the patient is assessed by a competent health professional that he is or she is terminally ill with no bright hope of retrieval and in serious in pain. Secondly, where the patient is in coma and there is no indication of recovery from the illness or situation. Thirdly, when the patient is brain-dead, there is no sign that the patient will recover, a nd that no wholeness is footing the bill for his or her medical expense. The ethical principle or theory on which I base my perspective is utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is the creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, the greatest happiness principle (Mack, 2004, p. 63). Mack (2004, p. 63) continues that it holds that actions are right in proportion to happiness and wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. Allowing a person to suffer extreme pain when dying will highly magnify the grief and sufferings not only of his or her loved ones but also of the patient. A person who is brain dead with no likelihood of waking up and surviving produces grief for his or her loved ones. Most likely, if a patient in coma is asked of his or her opinion on his or her situation (situation of take outed coma and prolong suffering for her loved ones), he or she would vote for the withdrawal of his or her life support system. If nobody is footing the bill for ones life support sy stem and dying or not waking up is the likely outcome, then it might also be better if the life support system of the individual is withdrawn. 4.0. Counter-Argument Those who subscribe to the deontological or duty-oriented theories on ethics will probably oppose my position. correspond to Edge and Groves (2006, p. 38), deontological ethicists feel that the basic rightness or wrongness of an act depend on its intrinsic nature than on the situation or